What MADE us?
259 Responses
|
Created by DarthDan
|
Send a 
to DarthDan
|
View Questions
|
Send a
to DarthDan
|
View Questions
This is my second quiz on my theories on how the the universe was started. This quiz does not imply that religion is true, but it does not attack it. If you want to attack my theories, go ahead, make a comment. I want lots of debate on this quiz. If you want to improve on my theories, then I incourage you to make a comment.
Sorry, we cannot display these survey results because you either have JavaScript turned off or an old version of Macromedia's Flash Player. Get the latest Flash player.
Like this quiz? Send a gift to the quiz creator, DarthDan!
Post This Quiz
129 Comments
You cannot make living things from nonliving things? Ok. Fundamentally what are you made of? protons, neutrons, and electrons. Unzoom and you then have atoms unzoom some more you have molecules unzoom more you have proteins and unzoom way more and then you have the fundamental of life the cell. So living things are made from nonliving things. What is the difference between you and a rock? Answer: Atomic arrangement.
the difference between a human and a rock is that humans were made in God's image and a rock was not...
I wish I had the time to go over all of your logical fallacies but I don't. well.. Cheers.
Are you seriously rude to all the quizzez you take.
You are mistaking "made out of" with "come from". Arostotle said that animals spring from lifeless thing like mud. People believed that for 1,900 years. When it was proven wrong they changed the theory to mean that microorganisms spring from lifeless substances. That has been proven to be false and now some scientists say that under radical surcumstances in radical times life can spring from non life. Scientists have not been able to do that. There is absolutely NO proof for your arguement.
The chance your arguement is correct is the same as the chance there are Lepricons. Both cannot be proven for or against. Even when scientists have tried making life through DNA it has returned ZERO results. Something is making life go, and you can not trace it materially. Did you know that when someone dies, he looses 40 grams excepting gasses emmited during death? That experement was under very careful circumstances. I would like to know what other fallicies you think I have?
I see that the things all around us were created from something. They could not have appeared out of nothing without cause. The theory that first there was nothing and there was the big bang which created life is fallacious. What started the big bang? there had to be something to start it. If existence(spiritual or material) began then you would have to say that there was nothing before existence began. Then you would have to run up on the question of making something out of nothing.
If existence was not eternal, then we could not have even started. Point two is that if existence is eternal, then it has to be material and/or "spiritual". If there is only a material world then it must have been the material world which is eternal. If evolution was true, then the universe would have had an eternity to evolve. Which would mean that the universe is perfect. This is absolutely false. The only solution is that there is a spiritual world and the universe is not eternal.
The human race would have died out if it were not for reproduction. The rate of decay is much slower for non living things. Small atoms do not experience enough resistance to decay but larger ones do. Star will one day go out. Decay comes from resistance, and believe me there is alot of that in the universe. Mountains will become flat. Even volcanoes which make mountains will eventually die out. The more complicated the universe is, the longer it would take it to evolve to this point.
i didnt get most of it
You are wrong on many levels. First I would like to inquire as to what you were trying to get at when you said "he looses 40 grams excepting gasses emitted during death". If you trying to make me think that was some kind of spirit or soul then you are contradicting yourself, because it could not be because then you would be implying that spirits/souls have mass, which, of course, would make them physical and not spiritual.
This post pertains to your first post. I hope you are not tryinh to become a scientist because thinking those things will get you nowhere. There is a massive amount of proof for my argument, which, by the way, you have no idea what it is. You can start by checking out one possible explaination called The Oparin Hypothesis. It would, literally, take a years worth of typing to give you all of the evidence for a god-free universe.
And it would take a lot more typing to present all the evidence that God does exist.