wwwwwwoooooo hunger games is beating harry potter just like it should.
hunger games is good but Harry Potter touches you, it leaves a mark, it will go on for generations, and it will forever be in my heart. <3
GASP THESE QUIZZES GO AGAINST MAN KIND, THE CHOICE IS IMPOSSIBLE, HOW DARE YOU CREATE THIS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
the hunger was so poorly written i mean harry potter took 10 years of planning in depth plot, everything ties in, and the description and amount of characters is phenominal, where as hunger games was so boring and whiney that i feel asleep =.= there was no writting skill what so ever i thought a character was a boy untill it mentioned half way through the book it was a girl i mean come on and it was written in present tense? there plot holes aswell (dont hate, this quiz was asking for opinions)
I LOVE BOTH BUT HERE I MUST CHOOSE HUNGER GAMES!
Hunger games hunger games hunger games hunger games hunger games!!!
Harry Potter all the way. I grew up with that series... Hunger Games is a pretty decent series, But I will always love Harry Potter... even though it's over for some people, it will NEVER be over for the true fans.
Thanks JK Rowling, you made my childhoos (and life still today) a blast. â™¥
Well Harry Potter came out in 1999 and Hunger Games came out in 2008, so really Hunger Games is better because it's at 3.5 and its been out for 3 yrs where as Harry Potters been out for 12 See the diffrence
I'm a true Harry Potter Fan. Hunger Games may be good, but harry potter creams it. 400 million harry potter books have been sold. Compared to the 3.5 million books that hunger games sold. See The Difference? Yeah.
Just give it some time. Harry Potter came out in 1999 and Hunger Games in 2008, so Harry Potter has an advantage at that.
Number of books sold does not equal quality. By that standard every terrible Boy Band built on the premise of taking advantage of young girls using a bunch of scantily dressed pretty boys are in fact some of the greatest bands ever.
They are not.
And Harry Potter's quality as a book (and it is a good book) does not come from the fact that HUR DUR IT DUN SOLD A LOT OF COPIES HUR DUR.
By that standard, if it had only sold a few copies, would it be utter crap? No. It is good because it is good.